Rock Music Audiobook Sampler Plus Print Media Adjunct and Obligatory Okra Image

It’s Spotify Wrapped season again, mofos, which means it’s anti-Spotify season again, with suggestions that you should consume conventional music-conveyance media instead of stream, as though the two don’t go together in a yes and sort of way.

Once I’ve worn something out on the streaming service, particularly something new by an active band, I usually acquire a physical copy via Bandcamp (semi-recently: Course in Fable by Ryley Walker, Country Tropics by Old Saw, You Took That Walk for the Two of Us by Andy Boay, The Expanding Flower Planet by Deardoorian, and Dawn by Ulann Passerine/Steven R. Smith) or directly from the record company (lately more often than not from Philly’s own, No Quarter: Hear the Children Sing The Evidence by Bonnie Prince Billy, Third and Ipsa Corpora by Nathan Salsburg, Evolution Here We Come by Chris Forsyth, This Is Basic by Basic, Daylight Daylight by Steve Gunn).

If it’s an old release, I get it via Discogs or hope to find it on tri-annual Princeton Record Exchange visits.

I listen to and acquire records (now called “vinyl”), less often recently in part due to having to interrupt the flow of WFH’ing to stand and flip the side but also due to $$$ — at the aforementioned Princeton Record Exchange, they clearly semi-recently upped the price from $1.99 to $7.99 on tons of records, simply by adding a centimeter-long leftwards horizontal line from the top of the “1”.

I listen to and acquire CDs (recently classical CDs acquired for $5 a bag at my local public library’s biannual book sale), since they’re so inexpensive and allow for 60+ minutes of consistent sedentary concentration during the work day.

Same with books: I would mostly read conventional print books but there’s movement in the direction of other media and I know better than to resist the flow. I’m always reading at least one (usually two or three) print editions while also reading ebooks (particularly in languages other than English because the dictionary and translation functions are so efficient for clarifying/learning BUT ALSO everything in the public domain is available for free via Project Gutenberg so it’s easy enough to build a sweet canonical electronic library AND SADLY BECAUSE the text is consistently sized and therefore easier for me to read now that I’m clearly going blind thanks to advanced age).

And lately, the past year or so, I’ve started to move away from listening to podcasts and integrating more audiobooks into my life. Listening to audiobooks doesn’t replace reading print books but it does take the place of listening to podcasts. I tend to prefer audiobooks that don’t require total attention, that can be lived with in a way, although I feel like I listen closely enough. What’s interesting is that scenes or images in the book are doubled/imprinted by images of where I was when listening to them. I used to walk and read all the time, so I’m accustomed to imprinting scenes in novels with where I was when I read them, but it’s more pronounced with audiobooks because eyes are free to see.

Below I’ve compiled impressions of a few audiobooks I’ve listened to recently related to ye olde rock music (excluding The Grateful Dead, its own genre requiring a unique page), with a few old-fashioned print books thrown in too. Images link to the audiobook on Spotify or the publisher’s page for the book. The image at the top of the screen is okra. (This video narrated by Jesse Jarnow is worth watching if you don’t associate okra with anything special.)

Our Band Could Be Your Life: Scenes from the American Indie Underground, 1981-1991 by Michael Azerrad

Probably the most enjoyable audiobook I’ve ever listened to — worth it alone for Franzen reading the chapter about Mission of Burma or Fred Armisen reading about The Butthole Surfers. But every chapter, even for bands I’ve never really liked much (Black Flag, Minor Threat, Hüsker Dü, The Replacements, Mudhoney, Fugazi), completely activated my imagination as I listened, transporting me from wherever I was while listening in my current middle-age suburban existence (driving to and from Costco listening to the chapter on The Replacements, working out listening to the chapter on the Minutemen, doing a ton of dishes after our dishwasher broke listening to the chapter about Minor Threat, mowing the lawn listening to the chapter on Sonic Youth, waiting for daughter to get off bus from summer school listening to the chapter on Dinosaur Jr, sitting pool-side as wife and daughter float around in the water listening to the chapter on Mission of Burma).

As the father of a unique young daughter, it was comforting to hear how isolated and weird all these kids were before they started their bands, how immersed they were in music, and how that isolation and immersion ultimately paid off. The Minutemen chapter is probably the most inspiring or interesting and affecting with the death of D. Boone, but all the chapters are memorable.

Particularly enjoyed the last chapter on Beat Happening, the only band covered I’d never listened to/knew nothing about. And also throughout but particularly in the Mudhoney chapter it’s exciting when it’s all about the early Seattle grunge scene and there’s the first mention of the “grease monkey”-looking singer guitarist with the piercing eyes and his super-tall bassist . . . Really just a wonderfully executed collection of relatively contemporary adventure stories.

Loved also that Greg Ginn, the founder of SST Records, had seen the Dead seventy-something times.ˆ

Come As You Are: The Story of Nirvana by Michael Azerrad, Kurt Loder (Narrator)

Had high expectations for this after loving the audiobook for Azerrad’s follow-up Our Band Could Be Your Life, but, maybe because it’s read by the official voice of MTV News Kurt Loder (who every once in a while unexpectedly mangled syllables in a way that seemed familiar — and sure enough he’s from Ocean City, NJ), it came off seeming a little Rolling Stone book-length feature? Interesting, particularly the early days growing-up stuff for all three main members of the band, as well as the handful of drummers who came before Dave Grohl. And loved the early image of young Kurt making up punk rock songs on his guitar in his bedroom without having heard punk rock yet.

I wasn’t really all that into Nirvana when Cobain was alive, other than saying aloud “dude’s definitely a star” while watching the video for Heart-Shaped Box my senior year in college right around the time he died (weeks before, I think). The next year working in the kitchen of a barbecue restaurant in Austin we played a tape of In Utero over and over and I came to love it, respecting how he’d backed up sensationalist self-harming lyrics with action (ie, “look on the bright side . . .” etc), singing aloud with gusto to lines like “you can’t fire me ‘cuz I quit!”

And then the next year I was in a nearly empty bar, more like a little dance hall, one afternoon in Utila, an island on the backpacker gringo trail off the north coast of Honduras, where I stopped in because they were playing Teen Spirit really loud on a PA in there. I sat at the bar and drank like three ice-cold beers as they played the entire Nevermind record at full blast. At one point a young Garifuna kid wearing a cowboy hat went to the middle of the dance floor and danced in what seemed like a country-western style but cooler, bringing out a subtle country flavor I’ve heard in the music ever since.

But generally, this audiobook was informative and sort of grueling knowing what was coming, particularly every time Kurt mentions how his stomach pain for example was so bad it made him want to blow his head off. I didn’t know that when he was young he’d been friends with The Melvins and tried out for them etc. And I really knew nothing about Kris and Dave, all of which was interesting enough as I listened while doing errands, running in pre-dawn darkness, at the gym, doing dishes and folding laundry etc.

Now that I’m nearly twice the age Kurt was when he died, I wonder what it would’ve been like to be his parent, to have a kid behave as he did, a talented artist but a vandal, a high school dropout, living on the streets under a bridge for a bit, working as a janitor sometimes, living in a trash-filled shack, proclaiming himself a punk. How did his parents feel at that point? How will I feel if my own supremely “willful” daughter lives like that over the next decade? And how would a parent feel to then have that same kid achieve monumental superstar success, only to soon after eliminate his map in the most extreme manner?

Will now listen to Azerrad’s reflections thirty years later on everything he’s learned in the years past, all the lies he was told etc . . .

Nirvana: The Amplifications by Michael Azerrad

The only thing semi-similar I can think of is David Lipsky’s Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself, the annotated transcript of a Rolling Stone journalist’s time with DFW, which served as the basis for the related movie, The End of the Tour. Can very much imagine this getting a similar treatment, the journalist’s friendship with his subject and the reconsiderations and regrets of having had that experience. Would make a fantastic movie, really.

Azerrad was a Rolling Stone journalist who wrote a cover story on Nirvana that led Kurt and Courtney to ask him to write an “unauthorized” bio about the band, which became Come As You Are: The Story of Nirvana. But this, published some thirty years later, pretty much consists I believe of annotations on the original biography, which I’d listened to recently and enjoyed. I’m not sure what this book looks like in print (see The Amplified Come as You Are: The Story of Nirvana) but this audiobook, read by the author, seemed superior or at least more interesting — hits the same major biographical points as the original bio, in less detail, with the perspective shifted from third to first person, adding an engaging, mature, often almost moving “privileged insider” dimension.

Azerrad is largely absent from the bio but in this he reflects on his friendship with Kurt and the band, going on tour with them, how he had been used by Kurt and Courtney in a way in part to show that they were good parents, how Kurt had fed him lies as part of the general myth-making (Kurt had never really ever lived under a bridge in Aberdeen, eg), and of course he reflects on Kurt’s inevitable tragic end, presenting the full complexity of the situation. He’s particularly insightful about how Kurt, well versed in the history of rock music mythologizing, cast himself as a sort of doomed romantic hero, creating at every turn a series of perceived antagonists.

Loved the bit where the author compares Kurt to Jerry Garcia (hesitant heroin-addicted figurehead of a supremely revered band), although without mentioning that Jerry’s father had drowned when Jerry was four years old, an essential rupture in his childhood like Kurt’s parents’ divorce when he was seven.

I’ve generally enjoyed this unexpected detour in Nirvana-world recently, and I’d recommend you maybe listen to this one first before listening to or reading the original bio.

Just Kids by Patti Smith

I’ve never really known much about Patti Smith, have never been able to get into her music despite trying a few times, and so I just didn’t really think I’d love this as much as I did. It really won me over pretty early, maybe when her family moved to the Germantown section of Philly and then to South Jersey and I recognized those places as the source of her accent. Should be required reading for anyone who moves to NYC with artistic ambitions. Loved how she slept in doorways and Central Park and lived the way she did for the first few years. Exposure to the city was her college and MFA. Generally reads like a WWI memoir (All Quiet on the Western FrontStorms of Steel) or a Holocaust novel in which luck plays such a part in the narrator’s survival.

Just totally engaging, how she met Mapplethorpe, how they became an interdependent duo devoted to art, their early days essentially living like hippies, seeing The Doors early on — moving to The Chelsea Hotel was really their first major stroke of luck, experience in that community at that time, with all the celebrity encounters (Jimi, Janis, Ginsberg). Loved it for the fact alone that it may interest some young reader to pick up Gregory Corso’s The Happy Birthday of Death, let alone Rimbaud. The whole bit with how she met Sam Shepherd was wonderfully done — such a funny scene when it’s revealed who Slim, the wild down-homey handsome drummer for the Holy Modal Rounders, really is and how he can afford to buy her lobster at Max’s Kansas City. Only in New York.

Just generally interesting how they’re confident in their underlying artistic abilities well before they’ve even actually created anything of merit, how that drives their ambition, which drives their efforts and experiments, all of which lead to photography and music, unexpectedly for both. But also this is of course worth it as a document of what the city had been like, an elegy not only for the author’s great friend, the other half of her bonded pair, but also an elegy for the seedy, grungy, affordable, eccentric, experimental, inspiring, artistic NYC that now seems like the playground of the international rich, the bait and tackle shop where Mapplethrope bought flies and beads for the jewlery he made now surely replaced by a Duane Reade or Citibank.

The ending seemed a little rushed and the poems at the end didn’t exactly engage me but overall this was fantastic listening, evoked and animated a world now passed, and I enjoyed nearly every minute I spent immersed in it. Looking forward to M Train next and giving her music a few more shots.

M Train by Patti Smith

Almost quit on it early on, deeming it aimless nostalgic musings, but then there was someone in the trunk of the car in French Guiana, and things proceeded apace as the artistry kicked in, usually with an unexpected revelation, spiraling back to a table, a notebook, a book, a writer, a good cup of coffee, and then off to Japan, Tangier, Mexico, and most movingly Rockaway Beach right before Superstorm Sandy. Ultimately an unexpectedly interesting and affective associative elegy for her husband (MC5 guitarist Fred Sonic Smith [who did not change his surname to hers]), the boardwalk, her old friends, her revered writers (Rimbaud, Genet, Bowles, Plath), a hand-drawn requiem for everything she loved she’d one day lose. Loved the books she mentions, mostly New Directions classics, and added a few to the queue too (A Night of Serious Drinking). At times, unlike in Just Kids, the prose seemed mannered, as though mimicking the sense of an archaic or translated text (something as small as the use of “of” instead of “about”), the word choice elevated yet not in an ironic way, but I generally admired the various textures throughout, especially what seemed like a long prose poem toward the end. After listening to this and Just Kids read by the author I feel like I’ve made Patti Smith’s acquaintance and am happy to have had the experience. If I see her I will say hello/hurrah I awake from yesterday . . .

Krautrocksampler: One Head’s Guide to the Great Kosmische Musik by Julian Cope

I’ve been familiar for 25 to 30 years with 85% of the recordings mentioned herein, so it was a lower-case thrill to read descriptions of Can, Faust, Neu, Popul Vuh, all the major “west” German favorites, and for me lesser-liked entities like Kraftwerk, Ash Ra Tempel, Tangerine Dream. But it was a THRILL when reading descriptions of recordings I’d never heard of, let alone heard, like Witthauser & Westerupp, Cosmic Jokers, Sergius Golowin (Lord Krishna von Goloka), Peter Hammill (Nadir’s Big Chance), Tony Conrad (Outside the Dream Syndicate), Walter Wegmuller (Tarot).

The writing style, the language, was fun too — semi-overblown loose rock gonzo journalism doing its best to make sense of all this cosmic outre output. Very much from the perspective of someone who was there (in the UK) at the time listening to this stuff as it came out, forming impressions mediated at most by John Peel and NME and random record stores. Often humorous: comparing Amon Duul I commune dwellers on bongos and maracas to a band of orcs, describing Can as The Meters playing avant-garde rock. Informative too: I’d never heard the bit about how Jaki Liebezeit (Can drummer) was confronted by a freak while playing free jazz who instructed Jaki to play monotonously, immediately changing Jaki’s approach. Also a good point about how Can could’ve released recordings that eventually came out on Delay ’68 but wanted to come out and make a clear statement with Monster Movie. Knew next to nothing about the musicians in Neu and Faust.

First heard about the existence of the book maybe in the late ’90s, maybe in a piece about Sean O’Hagan of The High Llamas, how he was reading this and wouldn’t stop talking about it. (For some reason when I half-remember this I see, without a doubt, the escalator at the Quakerbridge Mall in Princeton-ish area NJ, as though I were told this anecdote while there or read it while sitting in that area, but no idea why?) Never encountered a copy in the wild and didn’t think about it until a few days ago when I searched for it online and saw that copies were available, sure, if you had a few hundred dollars to spare. So I bookmarked a PDF online and read it with total pleasure this Independence Day weekend on my iPad, which is a recommended way to read it, not because it’s infinitely cheaper than acquiring a print edition but because you can flip from browser to popular music app and save everything mentioned that you don’t know.

Like the Yacht Rock sitcom on YouTube, would love to see a ridiculous dramatic sit-com animated series about all these groups, considering the cross-over among so many of the musicians. The only detraction I’d say is Cope’s less than total reverence for Can’s Future Days and Gottsching’s Inventions for Electric Guitar. Also the brief reviews at the end of the albums I wasn’t all that familiar with was like listening to someone tell you their dreams — or, more so, worth skimming for now, and worth returning to once the source material’s consumed and integrated.

World Within A Song: Music That Changed My Life and Life That Changed My Music by Jeff Tweedy

Prime example of the Midwestern American voice, viewpoint, aesthetic, moral stance. So intentionally mid because anything else would call too much attention to itself, always erring on the side of kindness/niceness in a way that seems (and is sometimes stated as) the result of therapy. But because so very Midwestern the sense that Tweedy’s constantly checking his primal or evil or “east coast” instincts (see the chapter on that Dolly Parton song) seems perfectly authentic coming out of such a familiar voice, occasionally even rising to seem insightful, inspiring, and enlightened, before immediately undercutting/humbling himself. If you know Wilco and/or Tweedy’s music you’re familiar with the general presentation.

I saw him play solo in Iowa City in early 2006 and his banter between songs seemed like really funny therapy sessions, but the primary memory is that between songs someone shouted out “play some mid-tempo dad rock” and everyone in the crowd laughed. I don’t think I’ve ever heard that sort of reaction to a satirical request. But it’s representative of the sort of friendly quasi-familial connection he seeks to create with his music, and has admired, appreciated and written about in this book, which includes short pieces on 30-something songs plus a handful of what he calls “rememories” that he believes have influenced the music he’s been attracted to and made.

The chapters on songs are all like takes on the little phrase in the sonata in Proust, associations and stories, mostly but not always from his formative years. Lots of interesting and amusing anecdotes, particularly one about Timothy B. Schmidt of The Eagles as well as some amazing moving magical synchronicity-type stories. The songs themselves are all great, sure, but after reading Krautrocksampler I sometimes felt like I was exposing myself to a more Common, Conventional, Connection-orientated Populist (CCCP) input, something that could come in handy if it prompts more accessible output from my Artistic Intelligence. Listened to this on Spotify, read really well by the author, supplemented by this playlist of all the songs considered.

Renegade by Mark E. Smith

Inspiring to read the words of M.E.S. himself, role model for all who might fancy a few pints down at their local, who savor the subtleties of the occasional sporting event, who openly disrespect daft twats if they deserve it, and are fierce when it comes to aesthetic independence.

The Fall by Mick Middles and Mark E. Smith

This is totally peripatetic-uh, interview-heavy, awesome intermittent reading-uh (of a spectacularly joyous sort-uh), that is-uh, if you’re currently totally obsessed-uh by The Fall-uh, otherwise I wouldn’t bother-uh, or better yet-uh, I’d listen me to some Mark E. Smith & Friends-uh then read this sucker on the loo-uh etc.

Have a Bleedin Guess: The Story of Hex Enduction Hour by Paul Hanley

Most interesting about that one phrase toward the beginning of “The Classical” that didn’t age well. Also great at demystifying the psychic MES myth, describing the permeable border between unschooled intuitive zero-fuckery and genius. The cover of this suggests the cover of Blast by Wyndham Lewis, an inspiration for the cover of Hex Enduction Hour and the MES approach. Generally, a swell read for fans. For example, cool to learn they got 6K pounds for the inclusion of Hip Priest in Silence of the Lambs. Also loved the “best album of all-time” reviews toward the end that read like vicious pans (along the lines of the singer is a neurotic drinker and the band is no more than a big crashing beat etc).

Your Band Sucks: What I Saw at Indie Rock’s Failed Revolution (But Can No Longer Hear) by Jon Fine

Rocks, with reservations. The language is intensely readable, consistently engaging, addictive. I looked forward to picking it up whenever possible and read more at night in bed than I’d intended. It excels at characterization of people and places, many I recognized from Oberlin and Brooklyn. Related so hard to the excitement of putting together a band and playing parties in dorm lounges at Oberlin — my college band, which the author would’ve abhorred most likely rightly so in retrospect, played the co-op circuit — Harkness a few times, Fairchild, Tank a few times, etc — and many friends were in bands, one of which incessantly practiced a Pixies cover in the practice space beneath my bedroom in Fuller, where so many memorable jams occurred, sometimes with friends playing guitar or drums without having any idea how to play). All the joys and sorrows of trying to “make a life in art” after college are so well conveyed. There’s real old-fashioned poignancy related to the end of Bitch Magnet (author kicked out), all the hopes crashing down with the dismantling of the most fundamental element of his identity.

The best part for me was a few years after college when he’s losing his hair, walking around the East Village wheatpasting posters for upcoming shows, feeling like he’s losing his edge, or like his studied disheveled look is becoming too authentically hobo. I also really loved the later transition the author makes to a “mature” or at least more stable career, essential for someone of a certain age in New York, sans spousal or familial support. The arc of the sneering self-righteous ascetic rocker ultimately learning to dance in post-9/11 Brooklyn, his post-graduate education, the revelation of a network in the US and Europe supporting weird loud music, all that’s great.

At one point 3/4s through I wondered if I’d really give this five stars and then came to spot-on descriptions of the massive Rubulad party (in 2000, the original singer in Oneida, a great psych band with Oberlin members, sang at least a verse flat on his back with his head resting on the toe of my boot) and the conversation-stimulating Kokie’s in Williamsburg around the turn of the century — and figured I’d now have to give this SIX STARS.

But then we came to the last section about Bitch Magnet’s reunion in 2012 . . . and the only urgency I sensed, its primary motivating energy, related to the author’s ego, like the book started to seem more about status than engaging and sufficiently self-critical nostalgia/analysis. In particular, there’s a page describing interactions with corporate types at drinks or dinners who ask the name of his band and then laugh — a page that made me not really root for the guy anymore, that made him seem insecure and lesser, all of which adds a layer of complexity to the book that maybe sort of improves it in a way by making “liking” it more difficult? The author generally started to seem anti-charismatic, and that too is interesting, like controlled dissonance?

I watched some videos of the author’s bands and some of a recent interview about the book, which I don’t recommend unless you want the voice and images evoked by the text replaced by actual voice and images of the author. It was also sort of “hard to unsee” the way in the few videos of performances the author raised his guitar and gestured in grand rock fashion — he describes this well in the book in text but on film it seemed a little much?

Maybe if instead of pushing Bitch Magnet merch on everyone at their final reunion shows he decided to give it all away out of straightforward generosity and goodwill, even as a self-conscious investment in marketing Bitch Magnet reissues, he may have redeemed himself for me, but it came off poorly when he’s already said his wife sold her company and they’re comfortable, living in the same building as LCD Soundsystem’s James Murphy — and all that insider revelry toward the end at the LCD Soundsystem Terminal 5 shows in 2010 came with a whiff of look everyone I’ve found my community, I’m one of them, I belong, I belong! Despite the supposed asceticism early on, there seemed to be a failure at times to restrain himself that also seems expressed, for example, in the oddly phrased subtitle?

But, again, ultimately, overall: this was a tremendous read — a great memoir for anyone interested in this era of music and its overtones will surely hang in the air and intermix with the experience of any sort of artist initially inspired and excited about creating something that feels like their own, discovering a community of the like-minded, and then winding up semi-disillusioned or just experienced (and weary) to such a degree that stability seems appealing as one ages. The last section could’ve been shortened and some unappealing observations cut, but all in all a highly recommended memoir for anyone interested in the experience of musicians obsessed less with commercial success than making original music.

Otherwise, for the record: I acquired and read this on the enthusiastic recommendation of a writer I’d met at a reading in Philly who’d graduated from Oberlin in the spring before I arrived in the fall (and is also cited in the acknowledgments). I first heard of the author’s band (Bitch Magnet) in the early ’90s. The author had graduated two years before I arrived and his band’s name was memorable and mentioned often enough. I didn’t actually hear them until my senior year and when I did it wasn’t my thing. Gastr del Sol’s The Serpentine Similar blew me away around then but I wasn’t all that into all that much music played by college kids at the time (it wasn’t yet called “Indie,” a term I at first associated with the Indy 500). In general I’m not really a fan of harder rock, other than Sabbath, Swans, and some more recent drone-metal derivatives. So many humorless heavy bands at Oberlin but I was hearing for the first time Can and Fela and post-bop (Sun Ra, Mingus, Ornette Coleman, Coltrane Quartet), also old blues and Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan and Beefheart. I guess I was into expansive and often improvisational stuff, an interest that evolved out of a serious high-school obsession with the Dead and JGB and then in the first year or two at college a very weird and more or less unknown band that you could see at the time in rooms with a few hundred people at most for not much money, although by a year or two after graduation I primarily listened to and saw whenever possible Palace, Stereolab, Sea and Cake, Sun City Girls, Polvo, Red Red Meat/Califone, Tortoise, Sonic Youth, Jim O’Rourke, etc.

A Curious Mix of People: The Underground Scene of ’90s Austin by Greg Beets, Richard Whymark

Exceeded expectations and so effectively evoked so many memories of seeing Ed Hall, Crust, Sincola, Jesus Christ Superfly, Fuckemos, The Motards (when I first moved to Austin after college in August ’94 I worked a salsa festival with some of them and we all got kinda wasted), Pork, Drums and Tuba, the Inhalants and so many other bands I remember seeing on posters and probably saw but don’t remember seeing necessarily 28 years later (Stretford is a band I remember always hearing about but don’t remember ever seeing and totally forgot about until I read this book).

So very grateful this book brought back memories of the bathroom at Emo’s . . . like a destroyed shed covered in graffiti and stickers and torn posters, standing in an inch of blackened piss, distorted churning guitars and droning bass in the background, wasted kinda scary dudes all around, many on more serious drugs than I ever did. I definitely never fully connected with the scene or knew any of these people interviewed but I loved the book. It’s really well put together, with a three- or four-page introduction followed by a pleasant polyphonic stream of interview excerpts that cohere and tell a story really well, organized by venues, radio stations, zines, record labels, the Sound Exchange, where I bought the Hey Drag City compilation and first heard The Palace Brothers and Smog right before I left town.

Great details throughout, off-hand comments that crystalize everything, like a Sound Exchange employee explaining how they were grumpy because they were the ones who were offered Steely Dan cassettes scrounged off car floors by guys who’d been up all night, desperate for cash to get some more of whatever they were on and the record store employees were the ones who had to tell them no. Absolutely perfect bits like that make this oral history so good.

I got this because for some reason I was trying to find a video of Spoon playing “My Sharona” at the Hole in the Wall — I definitely saw them play “My Sharona” there once or twice. The blond singer with the sunglasses had a thing for my neighbor and I’d met him one time right outside my apartment. I remembered a blond female bass player but all the pics I found online of Spoon from 1995 or so were all men, but then I somehow found this book, ordered, opened it, and there was a picture of Andy McGuire, the blond bass player for Spoon, just as I’d remembered.

I worked at Ruby’s BBQ from Sept ’94 to Sept ’95. I was twenty two, lived at 43rd and Duval with a roommate in an apartment complex with a pool for ~$300 a month each. Started as a prep cook at Ruby’s making $4.75 and ending at $6.50 or so, plus a meal, a drink, and tip money, which I spent nearly nightly at the Crown & Anchor, Lovejoy’s, the Hole in the Wall, Emo’s, or sometimes at Antone’s (Ruby’s staff were let in free). Had nearly no money but also super-limited expenses — no car, no TV, no cable bill, no iPhone or internet bill, no streaming services, no subscriptions etc.

I’d moved down there after playing in bands in college, hoping to form a band and conquer the world (joking) — wound up working at Ruby’s and biking over to open mics at the Austin Outhouse fairly regularly, solo acoustic style, recorded a demo tape I gave to a barbecue colleague who worked at the Hole in the Wall to give to the booking person there (who’s interviewed in this) but I quickly got frustrated with everything thanks to extreme early twenties restlessness (also no car to drive around the amp I didn’t have to play with like-minded musicians I didn’t yet know etc) and became more interested in reading and writing and wound up saving cash to travel for a few months by bus from Austin to Costa Rica and back, writing all the time.

I definitely wasn’t into garage punk or crazy Texan psych-punk etc and really to be honest there were only a handful of truly memorable music experiences that year I lived there — Stereolab for free in Aug ‘94 at Emo’s; Thinking Fellers Union Local 282 for $2 at Emo’s in Aug ’95 right before I left for Central America; Boss Hog in Dec ’95 right around when I came back before leaving for good; Maceo Parker with Fred Wesley at Antone’s in Aug ’95; The Flaming Lips in May ’95 at Liberty Lunch; my BBQ colleague Trevor’s crazy scrappy Beefheart-ish band Wonder Whip at the Blue Flamingo; Space Streakings, an incredibly fast Japanese band, just bass and turntable and drum machines and a “singer” who blasted a horn connected to an air compressor or something and ran through the crowd at Emo’s, detonating it, knocking every one around it to their knees. Maybe the best local band I saw was like a cross between Squeeze, Mission of Burma, and Polvo or something, a quartet of guys in their mid-thirties, playing to a handful of people — their wives and children and a few friends and me and the bartender — on what may have been a Sunday afternoon at the Hole in the Wall. They were dauntingly good but I’m not sure if they even had a name. I wonder who they were?

Listening to a lot of these bands via my preferred streaming service, the Fuckemos remind me of what I’d liked about the Repo Man Soundtrack when I was in high school, and they really evoke the sound of that time for me, but so many of the bands (Sixteen Deluxe – I remember slowly biking by a line outside the Hole in the Wall for one of their shows on a chilly misty night) seem to fuse My Bloody Valentine, Flaming Lips, Sonic Youth, Pixies, etc. Listening to them now I don’t really feel like my lack of enthusiasm for most of what I saw was unfair but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t fun to be young and biking around and drinking cheap beer and seeing live loud music nearly every night.

Haven’t been back to Austin since ’97. Heard it’s changed somewhat . . .

+

To support the publishers who have supported my writing, please acquire a copy of Like It MattersChaotic GoodNeutral Evil ))), and/or JRZDVLZ (all from Sagging Meniscus). Or my translation of Horacio Castellanos Moya’s Revulsion: Thomas Bernhard in San Salvador (from New Directions). Or Thanks + Sorry + Good Luck: Rejection Letters From the Eyeshot Outbox (from Barrelhouse). Or The Shimmering Go-Between from me (Atticus, the publisher, is kaput).

Knausgaard’s The School of Night: This May Be the Place

The School of Night may be Knausgaard’s most accessible, suspenseful, and intriguing novel so far. Whether it’s his “best,” or maybe even a nearly “perfect” novel, despite being the fourth in The Morning Star series, it feels complete on its own, unlike any of his novels since A Time for Everything, and therefore it may be the place to start if you’re KOK curious.

Perfect Backstory Novel Within the Possible “Star Structure” of the Series

My review of The Third Realm presents the possible pentacle-like “star structure” of the series, with interior “meeting place” novels set more or less in the present, populated by a handful of first-person narrators (The Morning Star, The Third Realm, and most likely three others to come) and exterior “peripheral” backstory novels mostly set in the past (The Wolves of Eternity, The School of Night, Arendal, and most likely SEVEN others to come, if the author ultimately fulfills the totally ambitious structure he’s suggested).

The School of Night is really the first of the exterior/peripheral novels (along the sides of the star shape) after the revelation of the structure by “the star architect” in the third section of the third novel to successfully show how the structure works. I’m not sure Knausgaard understood what he was doing, structure-wise, when he wrote The Wolves of Eternity, which is comparatively messy and not really something that can stand alone, or if read out of context of the series it would confound more than satisfy? But The School of Night shows how these backstory novels in the series can operate with great latitude, free from the central story of the interior novels and the present-day supernatural intrigue yet charged by the possibility of a second sun suddenly appearing in the sky or of a character who dies possibly not quite actually dying at all or returning somehow.

A Devil’s Bargain Novel

The School of Night is a Faustian pact novel. The somewhat overblown, certainly misleading, and potentially AI-generated jacket/flap copy suggests a literal deal with the devil in the guise of a Danish artist named Hans who Kristian meets in a London bar, but Knausgaard is a better writer than that. Instead of offering a straightforward “cautionary tale” on “moral depravity,” he applies plentiful layers of ambiguity. By the end of the novel it’s clear that total fulfillment of Kristian’s artistic ambitions has involved a variety of deal with the devil but when exactly did that deal go down? Possibly when something happened with his sister and he really only thought about himself and his art? Or before that, when he decided to be true to his own nature, to put all his chips in on his artistic self? By the time he meets Hans and is introduced to the director of a staging of Faust, it’s already too late for him, isn’t it? Or maybe when he took the trash bag filled with photos from Hans’s old loft and left behind a special little gift of his own?

The book excels at ambiguity of this sort, very much in large part because it’s also so clear sentence to sentence, page to page. And this ambiguity extends to what some readers call “likability,” the question of whether or not one should root for Kristian as he pursues ends via questionable means, or even more so the fundamental scene of the novel after he generously bestows upon an old decrepit homeless man two cigarettes and a light.

The School of Night also presents and in part rhymes with possible dynamics between Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe (the author of Doctor Faustus), who was part of a group of atheists known as The School of Night — why the translation is titled as such instead of “The Night School” as expected.

Künstlerroman

If Wolves was in part about a man whose life is committed to death (ie, a mortician) learning to pay attention to life, The School of Night is narrated by a noticer, a young man with eyes wide-open to art and music and physical beauty. But Kristian, the 20-year-old Norwegian narrator studying photography at an art school in London in the mid-’80s, isn’t an innocent despite inexperience. He senses his capabilities and believes in his potential despite not yet having produced much of merit. And wanting to create something great — or at least interesting, unexpected, beguiling, radiating whatever qualities he sees in what he deems admirable art — drives him in part to essentially cut off contact with his family and even take on a different surname after, while home for Christmas, he overhears his father demean him during a fraught time for the family.

(Christmas Knausgaard is flat-out wonderfully fun reading FWIW, and as far as I can remember not something yet to appear in one of his novels, complete with an outing in the snow on a sleigh to find and cut down a Christmas tree. But it’s not all joyous juletid thanks to Kristian’s søster.)

The School of Night is a Künstlerroman showing the development and maturation of a stjernefotograf (a “star photographer” instead of a star architect as in The Third Realm). Just as he associatively orders his records, one area of exploration intuitively leads to another. A focus on structure (the intricate architecture of trees, beams and girders of building’s under construction) leads to the darkly comical process by which he creates his breakthrough image. All of which is interesting and good, thematic jetsam that flows downstream with ease and at pace thanks to a few instances of super-satisfying extended suspense, the first major narrative propulsion benefiting from literary precedence, echoing Raskolnikov, and then the rocket boost propelling the final third or so of the novel comes with contemporary relevance related to so-called cancel culture, echoing the 2022 movie Tár. These larger sections of suspense in turn are driven by smaller, simpler yet sufficiently suspenseful sections relevant to anyone: will Kristian and his normie downstairs neighbor hook up, and will something bad happen toward the end to the boy?

Whenever a young child is potentially endangered, at least since I became a father twelve years ago, I’ve had massive trouble for example watching movies when an unattended infant wanders too close to the surf at the beach. I issue all-caps accusations of EMOTIONAL MANIPULATION. But Knausgaard, the father of innumerable children at this point (the acknowledgments at the end list a Brady Bunchian number of names) handles all this perfectly well, knowing how lightly he needs to introduce the endangerment among Kristian’s progression through the day with his child. I won’t reveal too much about all this, just that it’s emotionally stirring, absolutely lucid, engaging, page-turning, satisfying reading that seems totally “earned,” as they say in creative writing classes.

Abschiedsbriefroman?

The School of Night is also a suicide-note novel, something that only clarified for me once I re-read the opening pages (which I had first read eight months earlier) after the book’s perfectly satisfying ending, inevitable in its way since it suggests Marlowe’s death as well. But — spoiler — of course Kristian doesn’t dramatize his own death, it’s left open, and knowing what we know of the series overall, it’s very possible that death is not the end. (Apparently, per something I just read on Reddit, Kristian appears as a corpse in The Morning Star and The Third Realm but I didn’t catch this connection.)

A frame device introduces the suicide note motif, set in a cabin on the water in Norway, a setting that briefly appears three times, but the novel mostly takes place in London and Kristian’s family home in Norway in the mid-1980s, and Manhattan and London again in approximately 2010? The latter section in New York I loved, if just for Knausgaard/Kristian’s descriptions of the city. The bit on the screenshot below surprised and “resonated” — I laughed aloud and posted the image as an IG story seen by maybe two dozen friends, although I do like Lou Reed, The Talking Heads, and Television (and I’m learning to like Patti Smith, listening to Just Kids now and really enjoyin’ it). (Note: the autotranslation thing on Kindle often autotranslated into Danish, which is very similar to Norwegian.)

In Sum

Overall, I’d say there’s something about this one that feels almost perfect in its conception, structure, and execution, including loose ends that open spaces of possibility (for example the friend from Norway who visits or the guy who seemed to be following Kristian around London), almost like storyline nubbins that could be picked up and developed in future volumes or remain as they are, red herrings to enhance the sense that the novel’s reality, despite the supernatural superstructure, pledges allegiance in its details to the natural looseness of life.

*

I Reserve the Right to be Wrong About the Star Structure However

I just learned of the existence of Jeg Var Lenge DødI Was Long Dead — scheduled to publish in October 2025 in Norway — seems like it’s about Syvert’s brother, Joar, and takes place in the present era when the star appears. Per my pet theory pentacle structure paradigm, it’s an “interior” novel, I suppose, although since it apparently has a single narrator it’s not a “meeting-place novel,” so maybe the “interior” novels are primarily marked by a contemporary time frame more than the number of narrators? Or maybe Jeg Var Lenge Død intentionally blends the interior- and exterior-type distinction since it apparently involves exploration of the afterworld, that is, a place where distinctions such as past and present, living and dead, are transcended?

Betelgeuse Supernova?

I wonder if Knausgaard got the idea for The Morning Star series from articles on the likelihood of Betelgeuse, one of the shoulders of the constellation Orion, apparently going supernova fairly soon (within 10K years). If this happens during our lives, Knausgaard will seem prophetic for sure. As with DeLillo’s Mao II, something about novel writing sometimes glimpses the future. The first volume of the series was published in 2020, right around the time Betelgeuse started dimming, possibly in advance of an explosion. Anyway, something to think about and the likely culprit if you suddenly see what looks like another sun in the sky.

Where to start with Knausgaard at this point?

If you’re trying to figure out which of his many books to read first, do you start with six volumes of My Struggle? Four volumes of The Seasons Quartet? Two early standalone novels (only one available in English so far), an essay collection, a book on Munch, a book about soccer written with another writer, and a few others? Not to mention six volumes so far of the Morning Star series: The Morning StarThe Wolves of EternityThe Third Realm, The School of Night, Arendal, and I Was Long Dead those last three unavailable at this point in English?

Seems weird to suggest starting with the fourth novel in a series, but if you’ve never read Knausgaard, this may be the place to start — or a recommended reentry point if you’ve only read My Struggle 1 and maybe 2. You don’t need to have read the first three in the series, although knowing the themes and expectations of the others would definitely thicken and extend (engorge?) your reading experience.

The Below Relates More to My Reading Experience (What I Call “Words Without Friends”) Than to the Book Itself

My reading experience was engorged by the eggplant of novelty. Unlike every other novel I’ve ever read (other than a short Tomas Espedal book earlier this year), I read the original Norwegian/Bokmål edition of Nattskolen in ebook format (consistently referring to the automatically generated English translation via Kindle to confirm my understanding after I read a third of a page). Also, unlike every novel I’ve ever read, I read Nattskolen over the course of eight months, from January to August 2025, at first trying to cover a single ebook page a day and then aiming to accomplish the reasonably achievable goal of a single ebook percentage per day (1% of ~584 pages was about six or seven pages).

Over the months of making my way through the ebook, my reading speed and comprehension improved as I looked up words multiple times until I finally knew what they meant without necessarily translating them. Uforvarende simply meant uforvarende, for example. Notably, I learned the word faen in this, which for some reason didn’t come up in the Duolingo course I completed, and which the translation feature sometimes refused to translate, at most offering “damn.” And generally after a while I didn’t feel like I was dealing with a “foreign” language. Toward the end I felt comfortable with the process of reading a language that a few years ago would have been daunting/impossible, and I just downloaded Arendal, the fifth volume in the series, to ensure that the progress I’ve made in the language doesn’t degrade. (And I just learned of the existence of I Was Long Dead.)

Over the past few years, achieving a degree of reading facility in Norwegian and French, and this year in Italian, I’ve come to realize that I enjoy settling or at least mapping in my mind a territory that at first seems disorientating and wild. In the modern era, I first noticed this about 10 years ago when I rediscovered electric guitar and started exploring the endless world of effect pedals (see Neutral Evil ))) ), and again six years ago when we moved from the South Philadelphia city grid to the wild winding hills 15 miles west of Philly (see Chaotic Good). Streets in the new area aren’t numbered, their undulations determined by topographical irregularities, creeks, ravines, really old trees. It felt like a maze at first, and I loved not quite knowing where I was, that feeling of being turned around. But now I drive without really even thinking about how to get where I’m going. I enjoyed that process of learning our new area, just as I enjoy encountering a page of incomprehensible text and over time making sense of it, if not totally settling it. To put it simply: I’ve realized fairly recently that I really like learning.

But sometimes I wonder why I intuitively decided to learn Norwegian when first presented the options on Duolingo? At first I intended to “do” German or French (my Spanish is already pretty good) but then seeing that they offered Norwegian, because I’d read so much Hamsun, Knausgaard, Solstad, Vesaas, Bjornboe, Espedal, et al, I tried Norwegian and figured it would be easier than German or French for a native English speaker. I definitely didn’t intentionally decide to learn Norwegian just to get a jump on reviewers who have to wait to receive Advanced Reading Copies of Knausgaard’s new novels in translation.

And I definitely look forward to reading the official English translation by Martin Aitken as soon as it publishes (on January 13, 2026 — or before that if the kind/wise Associate Marketing Manager at Penguin Random House once again ships an ARC to my home), in part to revisit this world: mid-’80s art school in London soundtracked by post-punk on vinyl (I made a playlist of more or less everything Kristian mentions or puts on his turntable), a Christmas break in scenic snowy Norway, relatively contemporary NYC, and back to London and then a cabin on the fjords in sunny nocturnal Norway.

I’ll surely update this page once I read the English translation in a few months.

Note: the image at the top of the screen is a painting by Mamma Andersson, whose work is on the cover the Norwegian edition of Nattskolen and The School of Night.

*

Fulfill all your Knausgaard needs with the following posts:

The Third Realm by Karl Ove Knausgaard: Revelation of the Structure and Decategorization in the Age of the Holy Spirit

The Wolves of Eternity: Prequel to an Infinite Arc

New Novels From Knausgaard (The Morning Star) and Franzen (Crossroads): Subtitle Subject to Change Regarding Middle-Aged Male Writers Every Middle-Aged Male Reader Reads

The Seasons Quartet by Karl Ove Knausgaard

The Complete My Struggle Series by Karl Ove Knausgaard

Our Holiday Shopping Guide to the Lesser Knausgaard: The Essays, the Soccer One, the Short Lecture, the Munch One . . . Which Is Right for You?

Angels & Demons at Play: A Time for Everything by Karl Ove Knausgaard

October Child by Linda Boström Knausgaard, translated by Saskia Vogel (scroll about a quarter of the way down the page)

+

To support the publishers who have supported my writing, please acquire a copy of Like It MattersChaotic GoodNeutral Evil ))), and/or JRZDVLZ (all from Sagging Meniscus). Or my translation of Horacio Castellanos Moya’s Revulsion: Thomas Bernhard in San Salvador (from New Directions). Or Thanks + Sorry + Good Luck: Rejection Letters From the Eyeshot Outbox (from Barrelhouse). Or The Shimmering Go-Between from me (Atticus, the publisher, is kaput).

The Third Realm by Karl Ove Knausgaard: Revelation of the Structure and Decategorization in the Age of the Holy Spirit


In which we stroke the third rail of specious speculation on structure and significance in the “Morning Star” series.

We’d just finished the super-heavy ending of “Saturday Night Fever,” inspired to re-watch after streaming a sweet Bee Gees documentary. Wife lazed on couch, laughing at reels about English language oddities, how “baked” and “naked” aren’t said the same way despite similar spelling, how every “C” in “Pacific Ocean” is pronounced differently. She questioned the concept of doom-scrolling, and even proclaimed herself a joy-scroller. She regularly DMs me reels and, based on sounds that erupt from my face as I watch, I have to admit they’re mostly really actually pretty funny.

But then for some reason I interrupted wife’s joy to ask if I could read aloud the first paragraph of the thing I’ve been working on about Knausgaard’s The Third Realm. She consented and I started reading but didn’t get too many lines into it before she stopped me. It was trying to do too much, she said. It just seemed kinda boring.

To interest readers right away, I’d frontloaded the review’s “big news.” But she didn’t even let me get to the part that reveals the probable structure of Knausgaard’s new series. Wife made it clear I needed to start with something more engaging and simpler, along the lines of “what’s up with Karl Ove’s crazy new series? What do we know about Knausgaard so far, and how does his new Morning Star series and the new volume, The Third Realm, emerge from his previous work?” Good questions, sure, but still it pissed me off that she didn’t even let me get to the end of the first paragraph.

I sat and stewed some, away from her in a chair instead of next to her on the couch, my laptop screen showing the now disparaged opening of the review in progress, pissed but willing to consider the possibility of an enticing new entrance.

Later in bed, almost asleep, I thought the way I’ve written the review makes sense. It’s challenging to show how this single new volume and the new series overall emerge from several thousand pages of previous output. It requires straight-up summarizing information conveyance more than the snazzy sidewinding quippy excerptable hand-wavy point-scorey showy flourishes characteristic of the standard contemporary haute-falutin literaturkritik-grade book report.

The new Morning Star series seems like it will be monumental, with each volume deepening and complicating as much as it clarifies. I now realize that the My Struggle series was comparatively straightforward, thanks to its single narrator, sincere author/narrator overlap, and its stated intention to get as close as it could to the core of the author’s life. The simplicity of its form and focus was essential to its charm, plus it was much easier to write about, or so I now understand, dealing with this new series, which isn’t unengaging and isn’t boring but, like the rest of my review below, seems like the author is letting it take the form it needs to take as it tries to do a lot.   

Knausgaard had written about angels and reanimated characters from lines in Genesis, he had written more than three thousand pages about his life, he had written an unconventional observational four-part OULIPO-like/rules-based series of meditative descriptive essayettes on dozens of nouns (eg, apples, plastic bags, frogs, blood, daguerreotype, jellyfish, labia, badgers, vomit, toilet bowls, chimneys, silence, drums), so where could he go from there?

A natural progression would be to write about the fantastic, as in the book involving angels, A Time for Everything, but do so using the quickly/badly “inadvertent”/intuitive technique of My Struggle, with a series of first-person narrators instead of just one, exploring the dominant theme of The Seasons Quartet (interior/exterior, this/that) in an epic, Stephen King-like, HBO/Netflix-ready series concerned with rupturing the membrane between major dialectical oppositions, all while suggesting meta relevance about how one reads so-called serious literature versus how one reads genre novels.

Which is exactly what it seems like he’s doing, and most likely will be doing for at least another decade if my calculations are correct.

The Structure

Consider the third section of the third volume in his third series: it’s narrated by Helge Bråthen, Norway’s “only architect of true international renown.” Humor hardly abounds in The Morning Star series but similarities between architect in novel and author of novel are amusing. Helge has “an impressive mane” (see My Struggle-era author photos) and a similar history of marriages and offspring as the author — consonance enough to consider Helge an authorial avatar, a way for Knausgaard to acknowledge his success and guide understanding of his monumental new series (as its scope comes into view, there’s a chance it nearly triples the size of My Struggle, at least in terms of number of volumes).

In a project committed to dramatization, inclusion of newspaper excerpts lets the author editorialize about the series, describing here for example one of the architect’s projects but suggesting the multi-narrator layering in The Morning Star and The Third Realm:

“The rooms are rectangular boxes stacked on top of each other, each storey displaced in such a way that the overall impression is one of drawers pulled out of an item of furniture. The roof of the box becomes the balcony of the next . . . a space emerges organically, almost like a grotto, and this is where the communal areas are situated . . .”

The association of authors and architects has a clear precedent: Stefan Zwieg’s biographical portraits of great writers (Balzac, Dickens, Dostoevsky, Holderlin, Nietzsche, Kleist, Casanova, Stendhal, Tolstoy) were published in a series called Master Builders: A Typology of the Spirit. Helge, a literal master builder, goes on to talk about how “architecture is functionality,” perhaps with “symbolic value”: “The best thing is when nobody pays the building any attention, but uses it without thinking about it . . .  Everything works together and is part of the building’s aura.”

It doesn’t feel like a stretch to read this as the author talking about the structure of his novel, its “building,” when the top of the next page refers to Helge as “the star architect.” It’s almost a pun in a series about the appearance of a new star, and it sets meta-fictional interpretational sensors to maximum alert level. And then a few pages later Knausgaard the master builder of the book, in the guise of Helge the master builder in the book, talking about plans for a new school, delivers the following meta-referential revelation of the structure of the series:

“The building was in the form of a star with an auditorium, study space, a library, staffroom and canteen all in the middle, the classrooms located in the five arms as it were. The idea had come from the starfish — the building was right by the sea — and the North Star.” (page 119)

So that’s it. That’s the structure of the series right there. (Mic drop.)



Consider the shape of a typical star, or starfish: a central area, with five arms or, better yet, rays radiating out, consisting of ten sides. In the series, the central area of the star structure consists of multi-narrator “gathering place” or “interior” volumes related to the star (The Morning Star, The Third Realm), with the peripheral (in the sense of “along the sides of the shape”) or “exterior” volumes consisting of lengthy backstory mostly focused on a single character, set decades in the past, radiating away from yet fundamentally connected to the overall shape. So far, peripheral backstory books include The Wolves of Eternity and the forthcoming fourth volume, The Night School, set in 1985, in London and NYC, about a photographer, and the fifth volume, Arendal, set in 1976, about Wolves-narrator Syvert’s father on an island near Bergen.

The pattern of successive backstory books to come (The Night School followed by Arendal), each relating to one of the five-pointed star’s sides, suggests there will probably be ten total volumes of backstory? And since the first volume includes 666 pages and the star’s significance seems somewhat luciferin, the overall structure and story so far pretty much demand that we refer to the series’ “completely original” structure not as a star or starfish but as a pentagram. That suggests that the series overall will be fifteen books: ten volumes of “exterior” backstory books plus five volumes of “interior” central star-related books. (Only if a final volume encompasses everything preceding it could the structure be called a pentacle, essentially an encircled pentagram, not to be confused with a Pentangle, however.)

Or maybe the star structure will ultimately be based on the hexagram and we can expect twelve exterior volumes, one for each side, plus six interior volumes? Seems promising, what with its six points, six equilateral triangles, and interior six sides? Regardless, either star-shape comes preinstalled with copious geometric possibility, religious/historical significance, and supernatural resonance. Either star structure is also symmetrical, reinforcing the patterning displayed so far in terms of perspective shifts from one member of a pair to the other (eg, Arne to Tove; Kathrine to Gaute).

Why Not “The Third Reich”?

When I first saw the title of the third volume of The Morning Star series, I figured Karl Ove was up to his old tricks. The original Norwegian title, first published in October 2022, is Det tredje riket. My Struggle of course shares a title with an infamously problematic polemic, so I assumed the eventual English translation would be The Third Reich.

But a precedent has been set for not quite literal title translation. The title of the second volume lost in translation a “forest” (the original title, Ulvene fra evighetens skog, literally translates to The Wolves from Eternity’s Forest). Riket means “the kingdom” but, when paired with det tredje, I believe riket mega-evolves to Reich. Translator Martin Aitken (or higher-ups at Penguin) apparently decided to soften the sensational resonance. Which is fine and reasonable since Realm opens interpretative possibilities whereas Reich limits associations to Nazidom.

Also in favor of the translated title, “The Third Realm” emerges from the following passage about a charismatic young death-metal rocker, a budding “star” in his own right, “a god” the girls say, involved somehow with the new star at the center of the story (evoked it with anti-commercialist low-frequency high-volume distorted droning and maybe some ritual sacrifice?):

“Valdemar wasn’t a Nazi, even if a lot of people thought he was. When he spoke about the Third Realm, it wasn’t the Nazis he was talking about but something people had believed in the Middle Ages, that the First Realm was the age of God, the Second Realm the age of Christ, the Third Realm the age of the Holy Spirit.

‘We’re entering the Third Realm,’ he said.” (page 131)

Third Places

What can you expect when you enter this realm, with Knausgaard as your guide? As in The Morning Star, you’ll encounter spare chapter titles, a single particularly Norwegian first name (Tove, Gurte, Helthe, Line, Jarle, Geir, Syvert, Ramsvik – only the priest Kathrine has a non-exclusively Nordic name), followed by easy straightforward (no elaborate Euro belletrism, no luminous and lapidary stream o’ consciousness, no Beckett or Bernhard influence) first-person narration from that character’s perspective.

The Third Realm is also a third place, beyond home and work or school, like bars, churches, gyms, even social media sites, where people congregate, intermix, socialize. The narrators, we learn over the course of the third installment, are interlinked, often the significant other or family member (Arne’s wife, Kathrine’s husband, Solveig’s daughter/Syvert’s niece) of a narrator in a previous novel, but in at least one instance, there’s a much more significant relationship, the revelation of which brings the focus of the lone-wolf narrative of Wolves into the larger present story about the new star. All these interiorities consider themselves separate but are part of a larger external culture that exists inside something larger that’s out there, mysterious and unknowable.

Assuming you read The Morning Star when the English translation came out in 2022, you may not remember everything at this point. That was my experience on first read. It’s worth it to skim The Morning Star before starting The Third Realm, or at least read a couple reviews heavy on plot summary. Per Nabokov, being a good reader requires “imagination, memory, a dictionary, and some artistic sense.” You probably don’t need a dictionary for this one but the more you can remember the more pleasure you’ll squeeze from the third volume. If you haven’t yet read the second volume, you could read The Third Realm without having read Wolves and you wouldn’t be totally lost. You could even read The Third Realm before The Morning Star, although this third volume advances the overall story. Skip to the next paragraph if you’re worried about potential spoilers: it’s now the third day; no one’s died since the star appeared, not even passengers in a brutal bus crash; people are beginning to realize it, not just in Bergen but all over Europe; there are a pair of most likely significant pregnancies; a man who was pronounced dead returns to life; the last sentence of the book is a major cliffhanger.

Revealing what happens in the third volume of In Search of Lost Time or the third part of 2666 doesn’t matter much because the experience of reading those novels doesn’t depend on narrative drive or resolution of conflict or events. But hearing in advance too much about what happens may undermine this one’s pleasures, which for many readers may be limited to such revelations. In that sense, the series maybe doesn’t quite feel like literature of the capital L variety?

Novels are worlds – third realms in themselves – wherein readers can live for a while, interact with narrators and characters in territories constructed of language arranged by authors who guide the imaginations of readers to create the rest while recognizing themes as they emerge and evolve, connect and resolve. Other than a few canonical biggies like Anna Karenina or Jane Eyre, revealing what happens in novels considered “literature” rarely undermines one’s reading experience because events are secondary to the fabric of the reality presented by the author. So if revealing important plot points would “spoil” this volume, is it “literature”? And if not, what are the pleasures of reading The Third Realm and the first two volumes in this new series? And is that what we read for anyway, pleasure? The textual equivalent of “joy-scrolling” through Reels? Or do we read for something more, something we’re willing to work for, even if it requires the sort of sustained attention and active association that might cause the slightest my brain hurts mental strain, if nothing close to actual “pain”? Or is this “something more” just part of the pleasure in general?

In a piece about a recently published collection of interviews with Knausgaard, the editor says that The Morning Star series feels like Knausgaard’s NBA all-star game, with “the world’s greatest players relaxing and clowning around, amusing themselves, only feinting at playing defense, because there is nothing at stake and nobody wants to get hurt.” That analogy feels true, to a degree. The author of the piece meant that Knausgaard is no longer willing to risk his relationships. But these books also often feel like exhibitions, pitched at a leisurely level of intensity, or like Knausgaard isn’t out to prove anything at this point and he’s simply just enjoying watching the story emerge from his fingertips.

Consider these few lines toward the end in a Tove section, related to her recent paintings:

“This was the series I’d spent my whole life waiting for.

There was no doubt in my mind. I felt it in the depths of me. The source was bottomless.

All I had to do was let it pour out.” (page 423)

Or consider this excerpt from Inadvertent, the 2018 publication in the “Why I Write” series from Yale University, on reading Proust in Norwegian translation and then writing what became Out of the World, his first published novel (publication of the English translation seems like it’s currently scheduled for January 5, 2027, or maybe November 2, 2028, but I wouldn’t count on either of these dates — for a decade or so every pub date that’s appeared has been regularly pushed back):

In Search of Lost Time “was like a place, and every morning I longed to be back in it. I didn’t reflect on how it was written, I didn’t consider the author’s intention, I just read and read and read . . . Two years later, I was able to write. . . . It was just like reading, the feeling was exactly the same, I lost sight of myself and entered something at once unknown and familiar . . . It felt as if there were no boundaries in which I was writing, the text could go wherever it wanted, all I had to do was to follow its lead.”

The pleasure of reading (I originally wrote “watching”) these Morning Star volumes may relate to something as simple as not knowing what to expect and then discovering it. The presentation of mystery, a rupture in the every day, evokes a sense of disorientation, followed by pursuit of clarity, understanding, organizing presented elements by theme, noting repetition of images, phrases, creating order by picking up on trails, hints, associating them, leading to identification, questions, maybe a few conclusions, certainly no expectation of clear resolution. This series is not about the language, which is clear and fluid, lightly modified in tone depending on the narrator (the sixty-year-old neurologist Jarle’s section is somewhat more sophisticated and baroque than the prose in Geir’s procedural/detective section, which is more manly, clichéd, and no-nonsense than the spare, conversational, sincere language studded with the occasional exclamation point in the section from the perspective of Line, an infatuated nineteen-year-old girl). The writing, sentence by sentence, page by page, requires no real effort to read. It’s committed to dramatization, dependent on dialogue. The characterization is solid, the supernatural situation blended with details of daily life (everyone’s always firing up Spotify) is intriguing, the world of the story (essentially Bergen, Norway, more or less present day, or in the mid-1980s, or Moscow toward the end of the Wolves, or Sweden for a chapter in The Third Realm) is not a focal point of the story or generously described or anything like that, although swimming at night in a Swedish forest beneath the stars in Odin’s pool is wonderfully evoked. Most of the novel builds intrigue and pressure, and slowly reveals what’s going on, propelled in part by expectation of eerie phenomena related to the star. The sections are modular, fractal maybe, yet the overall narration doesn’t feel excessively fragmentary or intentionally disorienting. As the pieces come together, a sense of the larger interconnected story emerges, as well as thematic complexity and some clarity.

These books could be read passively but space is left for active readers to have some fun putting things together. As in my reading of Wolves, which mostly hinged on the importance of paying attention and interpreting existence instead of simply living, what most pleased me, particularly on second read, was reading the novel as a comment on reading the novel itself, scanning for self-referential clues to structure and significance.

The series could continue for decades and dozens of volumes if the structure in the photo — taken at Earth, Wind, Fire, & Ice in Chadds Ford, PA — is fulfilled.

Three Realms of Lit

Consider the following three hierarchical categories of literature:

The first realm of literature is solely intended to cause an effect. The name of the genre lets you know what it wants to do. Thrillers thrill. Erotica eroticizes. Suspense leaves readers hanging as they wait for something they know may occur to a character who doesn’t yet have that information (young lovers in tent, unaware of approaching crazed killer).

The second realm of literature includes novels that are more like a subgenre of journalism. They’re monothematic, about something or someone, dramatization of what otherwise could survive in the form of a non-fiction book or even an essay.

The third realm of literature includes novels about the search for the meaning of life, presentation and investigation of its mysteries, the solution to which is often the investigation/pursuit itself, the reading of which requires some work (attention, perception, association, recognition of the apparition of theme). Even if satirical or ironic, serious literature of the third realm sort asks more questions than it answers, its polythematics irreducible to one-line summaries on bestseller lists. And the artfulness, intrigue, imaginary experience, and considerable time-commitment of reading a “third realm-level” novel, all would be lost in the process of presenting its “meaning” or “take-away messages” in an efficient essay, article, or listicle.

David Shields in Reality Hunger suggested, possibly semi-satirically, that he reads novels for their gist. He’d prefer Hamlet if reduced to the prince’s riffs on gravekeepers, dumping the secondary characters and dramatic form, which only serve to deliver the famous observations on freewill and fate. But gist conveyance minimizes impact. That’s because third-realm literature is, as Beckett wrote about Joyce’s Finnegan’s Wake, “. . . not about something; it is that something itself.”

Um, excuse me: you’re aware that postmodern literary theory deems these so-called realms equivalent? The whole primacy of reader response idea? Authorial intention/biography is meaningless? This isn’t anything new, right? Barthes’s “Death of the Author” was published fifty-seven years ago, bruh.

Speculating about authorial intention is an essential supplementary aspect of the text presented, especially considering, as mentioned above, how details in the current volume about the “star” architect suggest the author himself. Also if the presented text emerges from a “serious literary writer” instead of a genre writer there’s an expectation that something more is going on than just trying to affect a reader.

The Third Series

We know a lot about Karl Ove Knausgaard. We know he’s a so-called serious literary writer. We know he’s not simply trying to scare us, thrill us, or spook us, even though it’s the end of summer as I write this. Halloween candies are on sale, easing the descent into darkness, heading for the big vote this year. The electorate takes sides as the artificial autumn foliage of yard signs, flags, banners, plastic skeletons, gauzy spider webs, ghosts hanged in effigy replaces fallen leaves. Election-related anxiety will rise as spooky season deepens. The border between here and the hereafter will seem more permeable as politicians speak in oppositional generalizations: us versus them, good versus bad, past versus future. But that’s not the role of literature or of serious literary writers, who, like their poet friends, are, per Percy Bysshe Shelley, “the unacknowledged legislators of the world.”  

Confronted with this and that, interior and exterior, awake and asleep, pleasure and pain, good and evil, night and day, war and peace, life and death, serious lit and genre shit, writer-endorsed unacknowledged legislation supports complexities, ambiguities, and the interpenetration of opposites. The only “This versus That” pairing writers support is a preference for blended hybrid duality over straight-up oppositional dualism.

We know that The Third Realm’s author is from Norway, he lived in Sweden, and he now lives in London, but Knausgaard is really actually an ambassador of a territory unbounded by borders, a region that’s nearly a religion, its holy trinity composed of living, reading, and writing.

Thanks to his six-volume autofictional epic we know when he first masturbated, when he first had sex, that time he vomited in Bjork’s toilet, that time he cut up his face. The last line of My Struggle famously declared he’s no longer a writer, and he’s famously published a career’s worth of books since then: The Seasons Quartet; an excellent collection of essays; a, for me, kinda middling book on Munch (the related Louisiana Channel interview is great though); an under-read engaging compendium of correspondence with another writer about soccer, the World Cup in Brazil, and life in general called Home and Away; and most recently the first three volumes of The Morning Star series.

To make sense of the 666, 800, and 493 pages available in English translation so far of the new series, it’s helpful but not necessary to have read the several thousand pages that amount to A Time for Everything, My Struggle, The Seasons Quartet, and even the slim book-length lecture on writing, Inadvertent.

Knausgaard’s second novel A Time for Everything repositioned extended elaboration of the biblical Cain vs. Abel and Noah stories from the Holy Land to Norway, and also presented the time when angels lived among humans. A Time for Everything may also include the strongest example of a technique that’s maybe his trademark move. In A Time for Everything, there’s a long stretch of My Struggle-like abject naturalism around the hut, daily tasks and annoyances and minor observations, that began to frustrate this reader until it started to rain and it became clear that everything apparently meaningless in the preceding pages amounted to the characters’ last hours alive.

This technique charges everything that comes before it, revealing that the slower “boring” pages wind up some restlessness so when that energy releases the pages leap ahead in a way that feels unleashed, refreshing, active, but also complicates and deepens the significance of everything read so far. He does this to a degree in My Struggle, dropping the megatonnage of 400 pages of essay on Hitler onto the final volume, sending shockwaves back through the preceding three thousand plus pages.

In The Morning Star, with each new narrator, in the initial pages before the star appears, there’s an understanding that supernatural intrigue will charge everything they’re doing with significance. Camouflaged among the details of daily existence are possible clues to something about the star’s meaning.

In Wolves, he does it again, with extreme audacity: he takes approximately four-hundred effin’ pages to present a common nineteen-year-old Norwegian dude in the mid-1980s as he plays soccer, pursues a love interest, tries to get a job, and attains some major new information about parents. But without the regular infusion of supernatural elements as in the first volume, the same fully dramatized, single-sentence paragraph/hard-return heavy approach seemed all very readable, sure, but what was being offered beyond readability? That question seemed key.

To reduce its complexity to a line or two, My Struggle fulfilled David Foster Wallace’s prophecy in his essay on American fiction, TV, and Mark Leyner that after the age of post-modern irony there’d come an era of eyeroll-worthy “single-entendre” earnest straightforwardness. On a formal level, it was about throwing off the expectations of high-art Euro literary convention to get as close as he could to the core of his life. This required writing quickly, even “badly,” so he could write truthfully, sincerely, without filtering the sort of thing that shouldn’t be mentioned. From Inadvertent:

“The thought of what others will think, of whether this is any good or not, all criticism, all reflection and judgment must be put aside for trust to develop. In this sense, writing must be open and innocent. But in order for something within this opening and innocence to emerge and become accessible, there have to be limitations, and this is what we call form.”

In the best possible way, Knausgaard, like many writers twenty to fifteen years ago, felt the need to move beyond the formal artificiality, the precision-obsessed preciousness, of “creative” or “belletristic” writing, to something comparatively unfiltered that seemed to emerge when he didn’t attempt to attain laudable high-art quality. Instead of carefully composing prose like Julian Gracq, Lawrence Durrell, or James Salter, every noun modified in triplicate, each adjective strung at the end of a sentence deepening the significance, Knausgaard as a rule, as a writing restriction or limitation, wrote five, ten, twenty pages a day about trying to write while caring for three children in Book Two, or about multiple instances of his underwear filling with semen in Book Four, or in Book Six the four-hundred pages of essay about Hitler, incredibly complexifying everything that had come before it in the five previous volumes.

This is not a review of My Struggle. (I’ve posted 12K words about it elsewhere.) But I think for this consideration of The Third Realm and the overall Morning Star series it’s important to consider the intention of writing quickly and “badly,” and the fact that My Struggle is essentially a six-volume, first-person, fully realistic novel (other than a 30-page essay on Paul Celan and the 400-page essay on Hitler) wholly constructed from the author’s memory, with the author and the narrator understood as essentially one and the same. The author wears the thinnest possible narrative mask. Which is why My Struggle opens with an extended description of a face, the only section in the series that the author has acknowledged was refined and reworked to conform to expectations of readers of “serious literature.”

The Seasons Quartet is not directly or obviously about the author. It’s more about random objects surrounding him, short meditations on something tangible existing in the world, and each volume also includes letters to his fourth child, and one volume (Spring) includes a section that breaks out of the pervasive “writing exercise” vibe of most of the project, returning to the mode of My Struggle, an account of his wife Linda’s mental breakdown, what seems like the real-life source for Tove’s psychiatric concerns in The Morning Star series.

From Inadvertent:

“I set myself some simple rules: each text should have as its subject one word, a thing, or a phenomenon, each should be about one page long, and each should be written in one continuous movement, one sitting. These rules had the effect that certain connections emerged that I hadn’t thought of or seen before. For example, the way we automatically arrange the things around us in hierarchies, assigning more value and significance to some things than to others.”

The important Seasons Quartet-related takeaway in relation to The Morning Star series is how Knausgaard perceives everything in terms of the separation or interpenetration of internal or external worlds. For example, a Thermos is something you bring from your home into the outside world. You take it on a picnic or a day at the beach or a long hike in the woods. It’s natural to bring a Thermos to such places. But it would be strange to bring a Thermos from your home into the home of another person. The function of a Thermos is to go from inside to outside, not inside one enclosure to inside another enclosure.

That’s a variation on an recurring theme in The Seasons Quartet, and it’s developed in The Morning Star series. Consider this from the neurologist Jarle’s section, summarizing his book Maps of the Brain, which describes his brain “as seen from the outside, in the forms of scans I presented and described, and from the inside, in the lived experiences from my own life”:

“But just as consciousness arises in connection and coordination, where no cell acts on its own but comprises a part of the whole, the brain as a complete entity is connected too, the brain too is one node among many in a network it shapes and by which it itself is shaped. Through this network, which is language, which is culture, which is society, Chopin’s piano music streams. Only when these two poles have been established, the mechanically precise functions within and the fluid social domain without, can our discussion about consciousness begin. For consciousness is neither one thing nor the other, but emerges somewhere in between.” (page 182-183)

The new series seems like an elaboration of that dynamic: interior, exterior, and in-between extended to everyday existence and the miraculous; life and death; living an unexamined life and paying attention (The Wolves of Eternity’s primary theme). And this dynamic is further extended along the lines of genre expectations, with the new series feeling not quite like Serious Literature, not quite like a Horror or Sci Fi or Thriller, but “a third realm” in between.

Decategorization

Tove, who narrates the first section of The Third Realm, uses an unusual word for this in-betweeness. She’s off her meds, considering some extramarital action with her neighbor, and hearing a voice in her head, or maybe it’s from outside her head, related to a make-believe world she created as a child? Regardless, Tove at one point declares that her husband Arne categorizes, whereas she decategorizes: “That’s the big difference between us. You categorise. I decategorise.” (page 8)

And that may be the novel’s keyword: decategorization.

Decategorization doesn’t appear in online dictionaries but Google shows this snippet from an article published in a 2001 edition of the European Journal of Social Psychology: “Decategorisation implies increased individuation of others (typically outgroup members), i.e., a shift from perceiving them as group members and attributing relevant stereotypic content to them, to perceiving them as individuals.”

This seems connected to the key dynamic in the Paul Celan and Hitler essays in My Struggle Book Six related to the Nazi dehumanization of Jews from “We” to “They” to “It,” a dynamic in play during the Harris/Trump debate that aired while working on this review in which the Orange One dehumanized Haitian immigrants in Ohio, erroneously claiming they were guilty of canine/felinephagia. Instead of being alternate “I”s, livin’ dyin’ individuals just like us, or members of the collective human “We” or even as othered immigrant “They”s, it’s suggested they’re more like predators, like bears eating good ol’ American pets. In the other direction, such categorization can move from It to They to We to I, an understanding that everyone is united and similar in the perception of their unique experience of existence. This can also be extended to questions of genre, mortality, and possibly morality: not this or that but something else unbounded by categorization.

What Else?

In Inadvertent, Knausgaard talks about being immersed as a kid in Ursula K. Le Guin’s Earthsea Cycle — investigating this line of potential influence I’ve only read the first two chapters so far but in the second chapter a demon rises from an ancient book of spells that seems more like whatever Geir thinks he sees on video than a dude with horns and fiery-red skin.

Comparisons between the probable influence of War & Peace and The Morning Star series, especially in terms of the oppositional dualities expressed in the former’s title, are beyond the scope at this point of even this super-freaking-long review, as is anything more than noting the effective characterizing shorthand of the music mentioned in The Third Realm: Jarle the neurologist listens to Schubert’s “Winterrise,” Syvert listens to Van Halen and Metallica, the history of Norwegian death metal is aired, the architect listens to Status Quo and notes that the original 1968 version of “Pictures of Matchstick Men” sounds far ahead of its time, and Tove has the title of Talk Talk’s “Happiness Is Easy” in her head, the lyrics of which are worth a look, as well as the interpretations online (“not just a blanket condemnation of Christianity but a call to turn away from dead religion to true faith”): “Take good care of what the priests say, ‘After death it’s so much fun.’” And later: “Joy be written on the earth / And the sky above / Jesus star that shines so bright / Gather us in love.”

The Third Realm starts with Tove instead of her husband Arne, the scholar who narrates the opening of The Morning Star. There’s a section narrated by Gaute, husband to the priest Kathrine. The famous architect Helge is married to Vibeke from The Morning Star and he meets with Syvert from Wolves to unburden himself of something he’s kept quiet since he was a child. There’s a new character, a neurologist Jarle, who’s most interested in the difference between consciousness and the vegetative state, how we understand the mind, and he’s also interested in getting out of his comfort zone and having his crystals read. Line narrates the central and most engaging section in the book, a trip to Sweden to see her charismatic love interest’s death-metal band. Line’s mother is the nurse Solveig from The Morning Star, and I believe Solveig’s sister is Lisa, wife of Syvert. Solveig the nurse is there to witness the miraculous reanimation of Ramsvik, and there’s a short chapter from Ramsvik’s perspective, in a coma hearing voices from the hospital resound in the sky above him as he encounters his dead father in a shadowy netherworld. The detective Geir questions Kathrine about something related to Valdemar’s band. So it’s all coming together.

In the Jarle section, there’s some dialogue about a strange case of a man in a coma despite “no signs at all of any physical injury,” possibly related to shock from learning of his son’s suicide attempt. That must be Jostein, the “hideous man”-type music journalist who seems most alive in the first volume. And in the detective Geir’s section we see Jostein in a coma, laid out on a hospital bed, but he otherwise hasn’t yet reappeared as a narrator since we last saw him exploring the afterworld.

Offhand, I don’t quite remember the particulars of the concluding scene of Jostein’s section in the first volume, just that it seemed like leveling-up in a video game to the mesmerizing spectacular finale of a Valhalla dreamscape. The Third Realm ends with intriguing cliffhangers involving Kathrine and Tove but do they deliver enough of a charge to propel two subsequent volumes of backstory? I had honestly forgotten the concluding line’s plot propulsion only a couple months after my first read. By the time the Wolves-like fourth and fifth volumes appear in English translation, will readers remember most of the first and third volumes? Extreme length therefore puts another dynamic in play related to recall of basic plot points, let alone subtleties, across thousands of pages, evoking the sensation of time passing even if it’s only been a few days in the present story, as in In Search of Lost Time or War and Peace. With time, the episodes in all these volumes will seem like half-forgotten dreams, an effect that in part is maybe the point?

If volumes four and five of the series are wholly set in the past, that suggests at least another thousand pages without return to the supernatural intrigue and emerging post-mortality situation of the story’s present. All of which will tax a reader’s ability to keep the story somewhat straight, but also to appreciate the overlap and connections among its parts. Like the ~400 pages about young Syvert in Wolves, which seemed like an elaborate extended exercise in paying attention, inducing fuzzy memories may be intentional — a feature more than a bug, in that the natural openness of the structure, character interconnectedness, and layering of story in long volumes released over time will inspire obsessive committed fans to actively take notes and surely post them in comments on Reddit or wherever to keep it all straight.

It seems like another opposition the series is engaging is narrative cohesion versus disorientation/fragmentation, or wanting to understand how the pieces of the puzzle fit versus accepting that not quite understanding the grand scheme of things is more in line with how one experiences existence, at least when it comes to questions of mega-macro-significance about the continuation of consciousness or the preservation of the soul/spirit after death, that is, mysteries dark and vast.

It may be smart to wait until the series is complete before starting it, in part because it seems like subsequent volumes will return to extended exploration of characters in the mid-1980s and mid-1970s, all of which may have some resonance and relevance to the three days in the present time frame described so far, but to what degree?

Based on the pentagram shape, I anticipate five volumes of central story about the star, ten volumes of backstory, and a possible final encompassing volume to form a pentacle. But I also reserve the right to be wrong: the series could continue forever, with every character open to a volume of backstory, compelled by eventuality of the new star appearing in the sky, what seems to be the end of death, and maybe something related to artificial intelligence (unless those threads are red herrings)?

So why bother reading these books?

I wasn’t exactly jumping up and down about this new series after The Wolves of Eternity, but now, after reading and re-reading The Third Realm and thinking about it while writing this review, even if my calculations about the overall structure and scope turn out totally off, I’m hyped/psyched to return to immersion in these worlds as I read the rest of these volumes. I haven’t quite joy-scrolled through the pages but the books have been generally enjoyable so far, not at all difficult, major themes are in play, and the author seems to be proceeding with the sort of limited or restricted freedom, within the formal environment, required for his writing to produce organic/seemingly self-directed narrative growth. Some sections of The Third Realm, in particular the teenage Line’s trip to Sweden to see her love interest’s death-metal band, are as vivid and page-turnery as Knausgaard has written. A scene with Valdemar and Line echoes a weird scene in Dracula, which Knausgaard has acknowledged he’s read multiple times, in which the Count slices open his chest so Mina Harker can feed on his blood like a sicko mother feeding its child milk. A few passages in the series deliver a similar sort of supernatural charge, like when Tove envisions the gates of hell thrown open or when Geir thinks he glimpses on video a wraith-like demonic form, but I wouldn’t say they’re the primary attraction. More so, there’s the simple pleasure of watching our favorite Norwegian master builder, impressive mane intact or not, bring into existence this monumental, uniquely conceived, extraordinarily ambitious yet seemingly effortless series.

+

Of potential interest to those who read all 7K+ words above and wished they could’ve listened to the gist instead: Beyond the Zero’s mega-marathon seven-volume 2024 end-o’-year podcast episode extravaganza kicked off with the author of the above post talking with Ben the host, mostly about The Third Realm.

*

Fulfill all your Knausgaard k-needs with the following posts:

Knausgaard’s The School of Night: This May Be the Place

The Wolves of Eternity: Prequel to an Infinite Arc

New Novels From Knausgaard (The Morning Star) and Franzen (Crossroads): Subtitle Subject to Change Regarding Middle-Aged Male Writers Every Middle-Aged Male Reader Reads

The Seasons Quartet by Karl Ove Knausgaard

The Complete My Struggle Series by Karl Ove Knausgaard

Our Holiday Shopping Guide to the Lesser Knausgaard: The Essays, the Soccer One, the Short Lecture, the Munch One . . . Which Is Right for You?

Angels & Demons at Play: A Time for Everything by Karl Ove Knausgaard

October Child by Linda Boström Knausgaard, translated by Saskia Vogel (scroll about a quarter of the way down the page)

+

To support the publishers who have supported my writing, please acquire a copy of Like It Matters, Chaotic Good, Neutral Evil ))), and/or JRZDVLZ (all from Sagging Meniscus). Or my translation of Horacio Castellanos Moya’s Revulsion: Thomas Bernhard in San Salvador. Or Thanks + Sorry + Good Luck: Rejection Letters From the Eyeshot Outbox directly from the publisher. Or even a copy of The Shimmering Go-Between directly from me (the publisher is kaput).